![]() ![]() ![]() Also,īecause of length limitations, we have not been able to treat every known text in Old English yet in our effort to cover a wider range of material than has been usual in Old English literary histories we have been obliged to treat fairly briefly some of the texts, particularly poetic ones, that have, primarily on aesthetic grounds, historically received a disproportional share of critical attention. Although we have attempted throughout to sketch briefly the Latin background against which Old English texts ought to be viewed, we have in no sense aimed for a balanced treatment of Latin and English texts, but we have attended to the former only to the extent that they contribute to our understanding of the latter. Still, it would not have been possible to produce so thoroughly an integrative study in a volume of this size. It may be an obstacle to the compilation of such a history that, as he says, “No adequate history of Anglo-Latin literature of the later period has yet been written,” but the insights furnished by his own prodigious contributions to Anglo-Latin studies take us close to the goal. What is needed, therefore, is an integrated literary history which treats Latin and vernacular production together as two facets of the one culture, not as isolated phenomena” (1991: 951–2 n. Michael Lapidge has put the matter succinctly: “We should always remember that works in Latin and the vernacular were copied together in Anglo-Saxon scriptoria, and were arguably composed together in Anglo-Saxon schools. The Anglo-Latin context is of particular concern. Although the need is greater than this volume can really satisfy, we hope that the present study will nonetheless prove useful to those who, like us, see literature’s relation to history and culture as our field’s area of chief pedagogical interest, and the respect in which it has most to offer literary studies at large. The renewed emphasis on historicism and the decline of formalist aestheticism in medieval studies have rendered it desirable to have a literary history that attends more singularly to the material and social contexts and uses of Old English texts. With this study we hope to serve the needs of those students and teachers who feel particularly committed to the changes that have characterized our field in recent years. Introduction Anglo-Saxon England and Its Literature: A Social Historyġ The Chronology and Varieties of Old English Literatureħ Legal, Scientific, and Scholastic WorksĬonclusion Making Old English New: Anglo-Saxonism and the Cultural Work of Old English Literature Corns A History of Romanticism Gary Kelly A History of Victorian Literature James Eli Adams A History of Modernist Literature: The British, Irish, and Anglo-American Traditions Molly Hite A History of Irish Literature in English Terence Brown A History of Postcolonial Commonwealth Literature 1947–2000 Shirley Chew Cain Andrew Galloway Donna HamiltonĪ History of Middle English Literature A History of English Renaissance Literature A History of Seventeenth-Century English Literature Thomas N. The series as a whole will be attractive to libraries as a work that renews and redefines a familiar form. Each volume recommends itself as providing an authoritative and up-to-date entrée to texts and issues, and their historical implications, and will therefore interest students, teachers and the general reader alike. ![]() The effect of each volume is to give the reader a sense of possessing a crucial sector of literary terrain, of understanding the forces that give a period its distinctive cast, and of seeing how writing of a given period impacts on, and is shaped by, its cultural circumstances. Each volume evaluates the lasting effects of the literary period under discussion, incorporating such topics as critical reception and modern reputations. “Cultural history” is construed in broad terms and authors address such issues as politics, society, the arts, ideologies, varieties of literary production and consumption, and dominant genres and modes. Thus the emphasis within each volume falls both on plotting the significant literary developments of a given period and on the wider cultural contexts within which they occurred. AndersonīLACKWELL HISTORIES OF LITERATURE General editor: Peter Brown, University of Kent at Canterbury This series aims to be comprehensive and succinct, and to recognize that to write literary history involves more than placing texts in chronological sequence. With a chapter on saints’ legends by Rachel S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |